Nakamura tops Carlsen in blitz final!
America’s #1 player Hikaru Nakamura is riding a successful year with several strong results including the U.S. Championship title and victories in San Sebastian and Mainz. He flamed out in Melody Amber after falling ill and finishing with a horrible score, but stated that December would be a pivotal moment for him and he looked forward to the challenge facing him at the BNbank Blitz Battle and the London Chess Classic. The biggest challenge of the tournament would no doubt come from hometown favorite Magnus Carlsen, the overwhelming winner of the Tal Memorial blitz tournament.
The tournament had two brackets in which both Nakamura (21) and Carlsen (19) dominated the field. Carlsen waltzed through the preliminaries with 5.5/6 and then beat Jon Ludwig Hammar 2.5/3 and blanked Sweden’s Emmanuel Berg 3-0. Nakamura simply demolished all of his competition winning the preliminaries with 6/6 and beating both Kjetil Lie and Peter Heine Nielsen 3-0. That set the stage for a Carlsen-Nakamura clash (three minutes apiece and two seconds extra per move).
There has been a lot of buzz lately on Carlsen’s 2800 rating and his ascendancy as the “hier apparent” to World Champion, Viswanathan Anand. While blitz cannot is not the sole determinant of strong play, this match captured worldwide interest.
Nakamura told The Chess Drum a week prior to the tournament that he was confident in his chances. Arguably the strongest blitz Internet player vs. the winner of the powerful Tal Memorial the two sat down to begin battle. This time Nakamura prevailed 3-1 in what will prove to become a heated rivalry.
Game One
Game Two
Game Three
Game Four
Videos courtesy of MrGaarder.
This was great. I didn’t notice any two handed action in any of the games.
I love professional speed chess.
Why isn’t Nakamura invited to the World Blitz Championships? Beating Carlsen in a match is a major statement. Can he do the same at classical time controls?
Naka has the focus and the intensity to climb to the top of the world chess ladder. He is just now getting the attention that he deserve. Carlsen won the world blitzs championship by beating everyone with a 3 point margin (Anand was even 3 points behind Carlsen and 3 points ahead of the rest of the field) and some else comes back few weeks later to beat Carlsen with a 3 to 1 margin and this is not a big deal? Of course this is huge. Nakamura is not going away anytime soon and his best days of chess is yet to come. Everyone is scratching their heads whether it was an oversight not to have invited Nakamura to the world blitzts championship in the first place. He will be there next year. Congratulations Naka.
great job naka!!! im sure everyone in the states including my self are happy for you. we as fans need to stop riding on your blitz results as a promise of your future. you need you to take out the big guns.
the result should not shock anyone cause naka has spent more time playing blitz than most people what will be surprising is if he can knock out some of the big boys the way carlsen has and do it playing great chess. if he fails to do this then he may only be a footnote in the pages of chess history. the time is now hikaru nakamura
well he is young and he has time. he is very promising i feel he will be a serious contender on the top level for a long time. Excuses however will not propel him into the top or gain the invitations needed.
@Daaim Shabazz: Your excuses are horrible. Carlsen is on his way to a historical chess career and you make petty excuses and explanations. The London chess tourney proved how inferior Naka still is in classical chess. He is a VERY promising talent, but making excuses for him is just horrible. Magnus comes from a country with absolutely no history of chess accomplishments. His rise can not be attributed to “his dad”. He started playing at a late age (compared to russians) and with far less support from mighty clubs you will find in Moscow etc. When, in a few years, he (possibly) becomes the youngest WC, blitz WC and strongest rated GM in history… what then? Was it “his dad” or his “location” which propelled him to the top?